Skip to content

lophiid

Status: Informative · evaluation gap (skip note)
Upstream: mrheinen/lophiid

Why UHBS did not publish UHQS for HTTP in this batch

Lophiid is a hybrid AI honeypot with a distributed backend/agent architecture. The maintained Quick Start path assumes OpenRouter API keys for AI triage/responders, optional VirusTotal integration, local CA generation, and multi-container Docker Compose wiring between backend and edge agents. This UHBS 4.2.2 lab batch runs under an air-gap constraint with no paid LLM API keys, so we cannot stand up the AI responder pipeline faithfully or grade HTTP engagement without inventing scores.

Static-only rules could theoretically be deployed, but that would not represent the project's documented operating mode (AI-driven request classification and specialized responders for injection, uploads, and shell sessions). Publishing a numeric UHQS without the AI stack would mislead CTI readers comparing against fully-featured deployments.

What analysts should do instead

  • Treat this entry as a catalog gap note, not a failing grade.
  • If you operate lophiid with OpenRouter/VT keys and isolated agents, author a hermetic inventory + Web-API HTTP TPS (see the HellPot HTTP lab pattern), then re-run uhbs-lab locally once your stack matches production intent.
  • For OWA-style credential sinks without AI, see graded proof for owa-honeypot in the same batch.

Protocol survey

Surface UHBS plugin? Graded? Notes
HTTP (agent) yes (http) no Skip — AI/OpenRouter dependency

Named product is survey documentation only — not a UHBS endorsement.