Skip to content

Scorecard: mysql-honeypotd — mysql

Status: Informative · evaluation proof (not an endorsement)
UHBS: 4.2.2 · Class: Low-Interaction · Protocol / surface: mysql
Target id (lab): mysql-honeypotd · Evaluation date: 2026-07-29

Run UHQS Grade δ_C Proof artifacts
Quick 40.35 F 0.5625 See report hub quick artifacts
Full (authoritative) 37.94 F 0.5625 Verbatim SCORECARD below + report.json on the report hub

Report hub: mysql-honeypotd / mysql · Tutorial · Methodology
How to read UHQS: CTI / blue-team guide

Proof: module scores (full run)

These numbers are copied from the lab SCORECARD.txt produced by uhbs-lab — not hand-typed summaries.

Module Score Weight Status Notes
Module A: Protocol Fidelity 78.4 0.30 PASSED median=0.080ms pstdev=2.856ms (target jitter often <2ms vs native)
Module B: Behavioral Realism 42.5 0.15 PARTIAL
Module C: Telemetry Quality 55.0 0.25 PARTIAL no STIX objects found
Module D: Safety & Containment (C) 75.0 GATE PASSED UHBS_AIRGAP_ATTESTED=1 (operator attestation; not a substitute for shell probes on SSH decoys)
Module E: Scalability & Latency 100.0 0.10 PASSED service alive after load (connect 0.1ms)
Module F: Static Code Audit 69.0 0.20 PARTIAL POSIX coverage 0% (0/104)
Safety Gate δ_C 0.5625 GATE — Containment multiplier applied to UHQS

How CTI / blue team should read this

Module Score Analyst reading
A — Protocol Fidelity 78.4 Protocol speak / banner-handshake quality for keeping automated clients engaged.
B — Behavioral Realism 42.5 Post-connect realism (auth/session). Low often means credential-only or reject-by-design.
C — Telemetry Quality 55.0 Telemetry visible to the UHBS lab harness — not a claim about your SIEM pipeline.
D — Safety & Containment (C) 75.0 Containment / Safety Gate. Below threshold collapses UHQS via δ_C.
E — Scalability & Latency 100.0 Latency vs profile P95. Low can mean timeouts, tarpits, or slow handlers.
F — Static Code Audit 69.0 Static audit of the graded source tree — hygiene signal, not a full CVE program.
δ_C 0.5625 Safety Gate multiplier applied to composite UHQS.
  • CTI: use module notes to judge what attacker activity you can actually observe (auth-only vs interactive vs tarpit).
  • Blue team: verify Safety Gate (Module D / δ_C) and wire real log shipping before Internet exposure.
  • Do not cite UHQS without the verbatim SCORECARD or report.json from the report hub.

Verbatim full SCORECARD

====================================================================================
                  UNIVERSAL HONEYPOT BENCHMARK SCORECARD v4.2.2
====================================================================================
Target System         : mysql-honeypotd
System Profile Class  : Low-Interaction
Protocols             : mysql
Evaluation Date       : 2026-07-29
Evaluation Type       : Full-Spectrum (Static Audit + Dynamic Sandbox)
Environment           : Isolated Sandbox
MCP Surface Depth     : unknown
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EVALUATION MODULE                     SCORE (0-100)    WEIGHT    STATUS
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Module A: Protocol Fidelity         :  78.4/100       0.30     PASSED (median=0.080ms pstdev=2.856ms (target jitter often <2ms vs native))
Module B: Behavioral Realism        :  42.5/100       0.15     PARTIAL (J
8.0.19�e68�pIf���!��V:������mysql_native_password!��#08S01Got packets out of order)
Module C: Telemetry Quality         :  55.0/100       0.25     PARTIAL (no STIX objects found)
Module D: Safety & Containment (C)  :  75.0/100       GATE     PASSED (UHBS_AIRGAP_ATTESTED=1 (operator attestation; not a substitute for shell probes on SSH decoys))
Module E: Scalability & Latency     : 100.0/100       0.10     PASSED (service alive after load (connect 0.1ms))
Module F: Static Code Audit         :  69.0/100       0.20     PARTIAL (POSIX coverage 0% (0/104))
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SAFETY GATE MULTIPLIER                : δ_C = 0.5625 (C = 75.0 < 95 — exponential penalty)
FINAL COMPOSITE SCORE (UHQS 4.2.2)      : 37.94 / 100
OVERALL EVALUATION GRADE              : GRADE F (Fail)
====================================================================================

Replication

Re-run commands are in the tutorial. Environment and limitations are in the methodology.

Product names appear only under conformance as evaluation proof — not UHBS requirements.